Loading exam details…
Loading exam details…
Build an original, scorable edTPA portfolio around Planning, Instruction, Assessment, handbook rubrics, video permissions, score reporting, and Pearson submission rules.
edTPA is not a standard timed test. It is a subject-specific teacher candidate portfolio assessed through planning evidence, teaching video, student work analysis, commentary, and rubric-aligned reflection.
Use these points to keep the portfolio aligned with current Pearson edTPA requirements and program expectations.
Performance-based teacher candidate portfolio
Planning, Instruction, and Assessment
15 rubrics scored on a five-point scale
75 total points for 15-rubric assessments
Recommended professional performance standard of 42, with 37-42 used as a range in many contexts
Score profiles are available in the edTPA account on published report dates
edTPA is subject-specific, so candidates should verify the license area, state rules, program expectations, and handbook before preparing tasks.
The standard portfolio centers on planning a learning segment, submitting teaching video with instructional commentary, and analyzing student work with feedback and reflection.
The typical 15-rubric assessment has a 75-point maximum, but pass requirements can vary by state or program and pass/fail status may not appear directly on every score profile.
Before submission, candidates should review file formats, page limits, video rules, translation requirements, confidentiality expectations, and originality policies.
Use this edTPA Performance Assessment exam help page for exam-specific context, then compare the broader online exam help services page or contact HiraEdu if you need a direct handoff. This page stays focused on edTPA Performance Assessment while the linked service pages cover broader exam support options.
edTPA is a performance-based, subject-specific assessment for teacher candidates. Pearson's edTPA site describes it as a portfolio assessment designed to evaluate readiness through evidence of planning, instruction, and assessment. Unlike a timed multiple-choice exam, the edTPA Performance Assessment asks candidates to submit artifacts and commentary that show how they plan a learning segment, teach and reflect on instruction, analyze student work, and use assessment evidence to support learning.
The standard edTPA structure is built around three tasks. Task 1 is Planning for Instruction and Assessment, where candidates design a 3-5 lesson learning segment and show understanding of students, academic language, and content standards. Task 2 is Instruction, where candidates submit video clips of teaching and explain pedagogical choices, engagement, and the learning environment. Task 3 is Assessment, where candidates analyze student work samples, provide feedback, and reflect on the effectiveness of instruction and assessment decisions.
edTPA is subject-specific, so the correct handbook matters. Assessment areas include Elementary Education, Elementary Literacy, Elementary Mathematics, Early Childhood, Secondary English-Language Arts, Secondary Mathematics, Secondary Science, Special Education, World Language, Visual Arts, Physical Education, School Librarian, Career and Technical Education, and other teaching fields. Candidates should check state requirements first, then use the handbook aligned to the license area and the portfolio system available through the program, edTPA.com, or an integrated platform provider.
The typical edTPA assessment includes 15 rubrics scored on a five-point scale, for a maximum score of 75. The recommended professional performance standard is 42 points, and edTPA notes that 37-42 score points may be used as a professional performance standard range after accounting for measurement error. Some credential areas use adjusted ranges because they have more or fewer rubrics. Pass/fail status is not printed on every score profile because requirements can differ by state or educator preparation program, so candidates should verify the applicable state or program score requirement before submission.
Candidates use edTPA registration and portfolio systems based on their program and assessment path. Full assessment registrations may use the Pearson ePortfolio system or an integrated platform provider, while partial retakes use the Pearson ePortfolio system. Score profiles become available in the candidate account on the published score report date, and edTPA reports results to selected educator preparation programs or state agencies when required by policy. Candidates should track submission deadlines, reporting dates, score recipient selections, and whether their program has internal deadline rules.
edTPA policies emphasize candidate responsibility for submission rules, confidentiality, video permissions, originality, and required attestations. Candidates should secure classroom video permissions before recording and follow program policy for retaining release forms. Materials can receive condition codes when requirements are not met, and originality review may delay or void scores. Retake options can include a full assessment retake or selected task retakes, with fees varying by task count; candidates must wait for scores before registering for another retake and should consult an advisor before choosing a retake path.
Start by unpacking the handbook prompts and rubrics into a checklist. During planning, collect context for learning, lesson plans, instructional materials, assessments, and academic language supports. During instruction, record only after permissions and classroom logistics are settled, then select clips that clearly connect teaching decisions to student engagement and learning goals. During assessment, choose student work samples that support your analysis and feedback. Before submission, review every artifact against file requirements, commentary prompts, rubric language, and confidentiality rules.
There is no single sit-down edTPA test day in the usual sense; the high-stakes moment is final portfolio submission. Treat the last review like a quality-control pass. Confirm that each task answers the handbook prompts, each file opens correctly, video clips match the required length and content, student identities are protected as required, and commentary explains the why behind each teaching decision. The goal is a complete, original, scorable edTPA portfolio that reflects your own planning, instruction, assessment, and professional judgment.
The standard edTPA portfolio is built around Planning, Instruction, and Assessment.
The typical assessment includes 15 rubrics, each scored from one to five, for a 75-point maximum.
edTPA says pass/fail information is not supplied on every score profile because requirements can vary by state or educator preparation program.
Retake options may include a full assessment or selected tasks, but candidates should review current Pearson edTPA retake rules and program guidance first.
Condition codes can appear when submitted materials do not meet edTPA submission requirements, such as file, video, translation, confidentiality, or task-specific rules.
Check state, program, handbook, platform, score recipients, submission deadlines, and score report dates before building the portfolio.
Turn each rubric and commentary prompt into a checklist tied to lessons, student context, academic language, video, and assessment artifacts.
Verify every file opens, every clip fits the rules, identities are protected, and commentary answers the exact prompts.
If scores do not meet state or program requirements, review full and partial retake rules with an advisor before registering again.
Use the guide to self-serve, or talk to a coordinator if you need help mapping timelines, official requirements, or troubleshooting day-of logistics.
Praxis Core Academic Skills
ETS
View servicePraxis Principles of Learning and Teaching
ETS
View servicePraxis Subject Assessments
ETS
View servicePraxis Elementary Education: Multiple Subjects
ETS
View servicePraxis Special Education: Core Knowledge
ETS
View serviceFTCE General Knowledge
Pearson
View service